Sign InOpen Brain
AI EngineerVideoSource Linked

Multimodal Collaborative Agents for Next-Gen Commerce — Nidhi Kaushik Vyas, Google DeepMind

For fuzzy requests, an agent should identify the missing constraint with the most decision value, elicit it in the right modality, then choose a response format suited to the task.

AI Engineer · Sep 1, 2026
Open Source Open MarkdownOpen JSON
Source Summary

The proposed loop builds a working state from conversation history, personal context, references, hard constraints, soft preferences, confidence, and live variables such as inventory. It then asks the **single highest-utility question**, such as room width before suggesting furniture.

Practical Implication

Treat elicitation as an agent policy: identify blockers, avoid repeated questioning, and select **text or visual preference boards** according to whether the user can articulate the constraint. Map each answer into the catalog ontology before retrieval, then choose a response format such as a comparison table or inspiration images.

Agent-Ready Context
The proposed loop builds a working state from conversation history, personal context, references, hard constraints, soft preferences, confidence, and live variables such as inventory. It then asks the **single highest-utility question**, such as room width before suggesting furniture.

Treat elicitation as an agent policy: identify blockers, avoid repeated questioning, and select **text or visual preference boards** according to whether the user can articulate the constraint. Map each answer into the catalog ontology before retrieval, then choose a response format such as a comparison table or inspiration images.

This is a commerce-grounded framework, not reported performance evidence. Merchant ontologies remain important, and agent-to-agent shopping is described as **an early-stage possibility**, with direct user involvement still preferred during discovery.
Connected Context · Feed7 Judgment

This turns process-first agent design into a concrete discovery policy: maintain structured state, ask only the question with the greatest expected utility, normalize the answer into a merchant ontology, and then choose retrieval and presentation. It reinforces human-led context gathering while narrowing agent-to-agent commerce to an early possibility rather than a demonstrated replacement for user discovery.

How Forward Deployed Engineering is done at Ramp — Leo MehrRamp’s intake agent reinforces the value of structured context gathering with a reported time saving; this Signal adds a specific policy for choosing the next question and response format.Healthcare’s Agent Bytecode: X12 as the Harness for AI Agents — Vasant Kearney, OnlayBoth use a domain schema as an intermediate representation: X12 constrains healthcare transactions, while the merchant ontology translates conversational preferences into catalog-compatible retrieval inputs.Agents' next frontier: agent-to-agent and network effects — Jean-Denis Greze, TownThe candidate treats cross-silo agent interaction as governed context movement; this Signal further narrows commerce collaboration by keeping users directly involved during discovery and treating agent-to-agent shopping as early-stage.Do AI Agents Know When a Task Is Simple? Toward Complexity-Aware Reasoning and ExecutionE3’s minimum-viable-path policy aligns with asking only the highest-utility question, though this Signal applies that economy specifically to preference elicitation rather than execution scope.
Context Map
agent#harness-engineering#tool-use#context-engineering
Uncertainty
This is a commerce-grounded framework, not reported performance evidence. Merchant ontologies remain important, and agent-to-agent shopping is described as **an early-stage possibility**, with direct user involvement still preferred during discovery.