Your Agreements Are a Database You Can't Query — Hiral Shah, Docusign & Sean Sodha, NVIDIA
Docusign and NVIDIA use a small extraction model to preserve complex agreement tables as structured data, showing where specialized parsers can beat generic VLMs in agent pipelines.
Docusign says it processes **about 1 million agreements daily** across 1.9 million paying customers. Pricing, SLA, and rate-card tables often defeat line-oriented extraction, especially with merged or nested cells.
Use specialized extraction before retrieval when an agent must reason over table structure. The NeMo Retriever parse model preserves layout, reading order, and table relationships; Docusign reports **20× faster table extraction** than the open models it tested.
Docusign says it processes **about 1 million agreements daily** across 1.9 million paying customers. Pricing, SLA, and rate-card tables often defeat line-oriented extraction, especially with merged or nested cells. Use specialized extraction before retrieval when an agent must reason over table structure. The NeMo Retriever parse model preserves layout, reading order, and table relationships; Docusign reports **20× faster table extraction** than the open models it tested. The talk does not provide the underlying scores, model list, or production error rates. Docusign still uses a hybrid pipeline with OCR for other fields, while quantization and multi-token generation were described as future optimization paths.
This moves document parsing into the model-selection path: when meaning depends on layout and merged or nested cells, retrieval quality is capped by structure lost during extraction. It supports a specialized, hybrid pipeline rather than one universal parser, while the missing model list, scores, and error rates make the reported speedup insufficient to establish production accuracy or general superiority.